VED PRAKASH VAISH
Sudhir Chaudhry – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. By these two petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) the petitioners have impugned the order dated 07.07.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Revision No.254/2013 in case FIR No.240/2012 under Sections 384/511/420/120B IPC registered at P.S. Crime Branch, New Delhi whereby the CFSL Experts at CBI were directed to prepare a “text inter-mixed with sufficient sentences from the questioned text” so that the petitioners may give their voice samples.
2. Since both the petitions have arisen out of FIR No.240/2012 registered at P.S. Crime Branch and involve identical question of law, they are being disposed of by this common order.
3. The concise facts of the present case are that on 02.10.2012 FIR No.240/2012 was registered at P.S. Crime Branch, New Delhi on a complaint made by Mr. Rajiv Bhadauria, Director (HR) and authorized representative of M/s. Jindal Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 384/511/420/120B IPC. The petitioners were arrested on 27.11.2012. While the petitioners were in custody, an application wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.