G.ROHINI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Dr. Nidhi Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Delhi – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. The petitioner passed her final year MBBS Examination in November, 2012 from Maulana Azad Medical College and being desirous of pursuing post graduation, appeared in the All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination (AIPGMEE) held in the year 2014 and secured 122nd rank in the General Category and was in the last round of counseling held provisionally admitted to MS (Ophthalmology) under the 50% Delhi University Quota, at University College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara. It is the case of the petitioner that after attending the classes of MS (Ophthalmology) for 6-7 days, she realized that she had made a wrong choice and approached the concerned officers of the respondent in this regard and was advised that if deposits the bond amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and resigns her seat, she would be allowed to appear in the next examination and counseling. The petitioner accordingly vide letter dated 17th July, 2014 resigned from her seat in MS (Ophthalmology) and sought permission to appear in the next counseling. Along
Miss Mohini Jain Vs. State of Karnataka AIR 1992 SC 1858
J.P. Unni Krishnan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1993 SC 2178
E.P. Royappa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) 2 SCR 348
Chintaman Rao Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1951 SC 118
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi Vs. State of Bihar AIR 1958 SC 731
Dr. Reema Chawla Vs. University of Delhi 104 (2003) DLT 868 (DB)
Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam (2009) 3 SCC 227
Manish Kumar Shahi Vs. State of Bihar (2010) 12 SCC 576
Chandigarh Administration Vs. Jasmine Kaur (2014) 10 SCC 521
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.