SURESH KAIT
Registrar, University of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner University prayed, inter alia, as under:-
a. Issue a writ of certiorari in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents thereby quashing / setting aside the impugned decision taken by the respondent no. 3, i.e., DDA in its meeting held on 12th May, 2011, wherein the respondent no. 3 while acting contrary to the mandate of the Master Plan Delhi – 2021 and the development control norms for metro stations as stipulated under chapter 12 of the Master Plan Delhi – 2021 has so allowed the respondent no. 12, i.e., M/s. Young Builders (P) Limited to construct a high rise multi-storey group housing society in the control zone of Zone-C and has further by virtue of the impugned decision has been pleased to allow development control norms as available to any group housing under MPD-2021, including a FAR of 200 and maximum ground coverage of 33.3%, without any height restrictions and has further allowed the plot leased out of the Respondent no. 12 by the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, i.e., Respondent 10, i.e., plot admeasuring 2 Hect
Subramaniam Swamy & Ors. Vs. Raju through Member
Bangalore Medical Trust Vs. B.S. Muddappa &Ors.
Sethi Auto Service Station and Anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Ors. (2009) 1 SCC 180
Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 2011 (5) SCALE 624
State of M.P. and Ors. Vs. Nandlal Jaiswal and Ors. (1986) 4 SCC 566
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.