1. By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns order dated 22.06.2012 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No.-I (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in LCA No.9/2000 appointing Mr. D.K. Tyagi, Advocate as the local commissioner, order dated 22.02.2013 closing of the opportunity of the petitioner to argue the matter and order dated 27.02.2013 dismissing the application of the petitioner under Section 11 of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ID Act) seeking directions to contractors for production of original records and also dismissing the objection of the petitioner that the appointment of Mr. D.K. Tyagi, Advocate as local commissioner was violative of Rule 63 of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’) along with the objections against the report filed by him.

2. Briefly stating the facts as emerging from the present petition are that in the year 1998-99, the petitioner awarded contract to contractors namely HTS Enterprise, Swastik Enterprise, Bhanot Electric Works, M/s. Competent Engineering Works and M/s. S.K