SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 751

G.P.MITTAL
Vedwati – Appellant
Versus
Shetan Singh – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:O.P. Mannie, Rajat Brar, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 22.08.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs. 3,33,400/- was awarded for the death of Manoj, a bachelor, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 18.10.2009.

2. For the sake of convenience, the Appellant in MAC APP. 419/2013, who is the mother of the deceased, shall be referred to as the Claimant and the Appellant in MAC APP. 213/2015 shall be referred to as the Insurance Company.

3. The petition for grant of compensation for the death of Manoj was filed by the Claimant under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act). On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of the container bearing registration no. RJ-09GA-1613 by its driver Shetan Singh (Respondent no.1).

4. It was the case of the Claimant that the deceased was in private service and was earning Rs. 6,000/- per month. In the absence of any proof of the deceased’s employment, the




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top