RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Rajinder & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Harsh Vohra & Ors. – Respondent
1. The Revision Petition as well as the FAO, both arise from four suits instituted by the petitioners/plaintiffs against the respondents/defendants and pending in the Trial Court. The suits being between the same parties and entailing the same facts are being tried together and common issues have been framed in all the four suits. The petitioners have instituted the suits for the reliefs of declaration and injunction.
2. The case in the plaint in each of the suits is that the plaintiffs/petitioners are bhumidars of certain land in the revenue estate of village Rewala, Khanpur, Delhi; that in the year 1995 they were in need of some money and asked one Sh. Ved Prakash to arrange for the money; that said Sh. Ved Prakash introduced the petitioners to Sh. Om Prakash, Respondent no.2 herein; that Sh. Om Prakash told the petitioners that the land was being acquired by the government at the rate of Rs.4,65,000/- per acre, whereas the market value thereof was Rs.5,00,000/- per acre and hence it was advisable for the petitioners/plaintiffs to sell their land; that the petitioners agreed to sell their land at the rate of Rs.5,00,000/- per acre to the respondent Sh. Om P
Black Diamond Glassware P. Ltd. v. Kusumlata Gupta AIR 2004 Del. 88
Kaliaperumal v. Rajagopal AIR 2009 SC 2122
Nafar Chandra Jute Mills Ltd. v. United Bank of India (2000) 9 SCC 545
Pritish v. State of Maharashtra (2002) I SCC 253
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.