SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 1350

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Rajinder & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Harsh Vohra & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sushil Kumar Pandey, Chetan Sharma, Lekh Raj Rehala

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.:-

1. The Revision Petition as well as the FAO, both arise from four suits instituted by the petitioners/plaintiffs against the respondents/defendants and pending in the Trial Court. The suits being between the same parties and entailing the same facts are being tried together and common issues have been framed in all the four suits. The petitioners have instituted the suits for the reliefs of declaration and injunction.

2. The case in the plaint in each of the suits is that the plaintiffs/petitioners are bhumidars of certain land in the revenue estate of village Rewala, Khanpur, Delhi; that in the year 1995 they were in need of some money and asked one Sh. Ved Prakash to arrange for the money; that said Sh. Ved Prakash introduced the petitioners to Sh. Om Prakash, Respondent no.2 herein; that Sh. Om Prakash told the petitioners that the land was being acquired by the government at the rate of Rs.4,65,000/- per acre, whereas the market value thereof was Rs.5,00,000/- per acre and hence it was advisable for the petitioners/plaintiffs to sell their land; that the petitioners agreed to sell their land at the rate of Rs.5,00,000/- per acre to the respondent Sh. Om P


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top