SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 889

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, MANMOHAN SINGH
Vimal Khanna & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Kishan Chand Khanna – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Aggarwal, Naomi Chander, Rishi Maheshwari

Manmohan Singh, J.:-

1. Regular First Appeal from the Original Side has been filed by the two appellants namely Vimal Khanna and Simmi Khanna against the Order and Judgment dated 6th August, 2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS (OS) No. 1162/2007 wherein the application filed by the respondent under Order XII Rule 6 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure being F.A. No. 15614/2008 was allowed by decreeing the suit of the Respondent. The appellants were given one month's time to vacate the Ground Floor of the suit property bearing No. AE-95, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi and hand over peaceful possession thereof to the respondent.

2. The brief facts of the matter before the learned Single Judge in the suit for possession, injunction and mesne profit filed by the respondent are that the respondent is a senior citizen aged about 76 years. The appellant Nos. 1 and 2 are the son and daughter-in-law respectively of the respondent.

3. The respondent was allotted a plot by the DDA measuring 200 square yards in the year 1982. The entire consideration for the purchase of the said plot was paid by the respondent from his own earning and sources. Subsequently the respondent applied for c




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top