IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MANMOHAN SINGH, J.
Helamin Technology Holding SA & Anr. - Plaintiffs
Versus
Haribansh Rai & Ors - Defendants
I.A. No.10720/2012, I.A. No.19935/2014, I.A. No. 15400/2012 & I.A. No. 40/2013 in CS (OS) 1663/2012
Decided on : 9-12-2015
HELAMIN - Trademark Infringement - Order XXXIX Rule 1, 2, 4 CPC - Order VII Rule 10, 11 CPC - Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Trademark HELAMIN - Sections 1 and 2 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 - Summary Judgment
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendants for trademark infringement, alleging that the defendants were using the trademark HELAMIN without authorization and causing confusion in the market. The defendants contested the jurisdiction of the court and sought rejection of the plaint, deletion of parties, and vacation of an interim order.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the defendants were using the trademark HELAMIN without authorization and causing confusion in the market. The court dismissed the defendants' applications for rejection of the plaint and deletion of parties, and allowed the plaintiffs' application for injunction. The court also dismissed the defendants' application for vacation of the interim order.
Issues: Jurisdiction of the court, rejection of plaint, deletion of parties, vacation of interim order, trademark infringement
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the defendants' use of the trademark HELAMIN without authorization and causing confusion in the market constituted trademark infringement. The court also found that the defendants' applications for rejection of the plaint and deletion of parties lacked merit, and that the plaintiffs were entitled to the injunction.
Final Decision: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for injunction, dismissed the defendants' applications for rejection of the plaint and deletion of parties, and dismissed the defendants' application for vacation of the interim order.
Manmohan Singh, J.
1. By way of this order, I propose to decide the following four pending applications:-
(a) I.A. No. 10720/2012 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiffs;
(b) I.A. No. 19935/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendants for vacation of interim order;
(c) I.A. No. 15400/2012 under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 CPC filed on behalf of the defendants for rejection of plaint;
(d) I.A. No. 40/2013 under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed by the defendants.
2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off, damages, rendition of accounts and delivery up against the defendants.
3. Brief facts of the case as per the plaint are that the plaintiff No. 1 is a limited Company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland and is the world leader in development, production and marketing of specific scale corrosion inhibitors used in water-steam and heating circuits/steam generators, warm and hot water networks, boilers, turbines, cooling systems etc. The plaintiff No. 1 began its commercial operations in 1986 when the trademark and the name ‘HELAMIN’ was first used in the course of trade.
4. Plaintiff No.2 is the wholly-owned subsidiary and the manufacturing and world export branch of plaintiff No.1 and uses the trademark and trade name HELAMIN under the license from plaintiff No.1. Plaintiff No.2 was founded on 11th May, 1989 and is a limited Company incorporated under the laws of France.
5. Plaintiff No. 1 is the pioneer and inventor of a revolutionary polyamines filming technology to prevent scale and corrosion in water-steam cycle systems (turbines included) as well as in cooling systems. The plaintiffs’ products serve to form a continuous and hydrophobic protective film on metal surfaces, thus acting as a barrier between water and metal to prevent corrosion.
6. It is stated that the plaintiff No.1 has a strong international commercial presence in over 40 countries across the world including India and has a leading share in its specific market segment within the global water treatment chemicals market. The plaintiff No.1’s products are sold through an integrated distribution network supported by the plaintiff’s international distributors in several countries.
7. It is averred that the plaintiffs have been using the trademarks HELAMIN 906 H and HELAMIN BRW 150 H since the year 1993 and the trademark HELAMIN 90 H-TURB since the year 2002. The plaintiff No.1’s trademark HELAMIN is coined from ‘Helvetia’ (the Latin name for Switzerland) and ‘Polyamin’ which denotes a chemical compound comprising of multiple amino groups.
8. The plaintiff No.1 had applied for registration of the trademark HELAMIN in India under application No.1717404 in relation to “chemicals used in industry and chemical products for the protection of metallic surfaces” in classes 1 and 2 respectively, as of 1st August, 2008.
9. It is also averred that as a result of long and continuous use since the year 1986, coupled with extensive sales spanning over a wide geographical area, the trademark/name HELAMIN has acquired tremendous reputation and goodwill amongst the customers and the members of the trade all over the world and has become distinctive of the plaintiffs. The well-known character of the plaintiffs’ trademark/name HELAMIN is reflected from the plaintiffs’ worldwide consolidated sales turnover from 2000 to 2011 which averaged approximately US$10,000,000 per year. The worldwide consolidated advertisement expenses for the plaintiff’s HELAMIN products from 2000-2011 aggregates to approximately US$300,000.
10. It is the case of the plaintiffs against the defendants that in 2001, defendant No. 3 began working with Helamin Technology Holding Group (HTHG) as a technical consultant for their UAE market.
During his course of employment with the plaintiffs, he had access to confidential information as well as end user customer know-how and received technical training pertaining to the working and applications of HE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.