SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 337

R.K.GAUBA
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Pyar Mohd – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. S.N. Parashar
Mr. Sameer Nandwani, for R-3

JUDGMENT :

R.K. Gauba, J.

1. By judgment dated 30.03.2012 in motor accidents claim petition No.1123/2010, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (“the Tribunal”) awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.9,20,961/- with interest in favour of the appellant, with suitable directions about its protection, for the injuries suffered by him on 27.10.2007 in a motor vehicular accident involving truck bearing registration No.HR-55F-9582 (“the offending vehicle”). The appellant, feeling aggrieved with the assessment of compensation, has come up through the appeal at hand under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (“the MV Act”) seeking enhancement.

2. Certain facts are no longer in dispute and may be noted at the outset. It has been found, upon enquiry by the Tribunal, that the appellant, then aged 33 years and working as a sweeper (under contract) of the Municipal Corporation, Ghaziabad, U.P. moving on his bicycle on 27.10.2007 was hit by the offending vehicle driven by Pyar Mohd. (the first respondent before the Tribunal) in a rash/negligent manner, from behind, in the area of village Dundahera bye-pass of Ghaziabad, U.P., as a result of which he fell down and his right leg was badly crushed
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top