A.K.SIKRI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Court On Its Own Motion – Appellant
Versus
Department of Women & Child Development – Respondent
A.K. Sikri, J.
1. We are informed, that the teams comprising of the members of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) & Delhi Legal Services Authority (DLSA) along with certain volunteers had visited Jail No. 6 & 7 in Tihar Jail Complex; that adolescent under trials/prisoners are kept mostly in Jail No. 7 though some are housed in Jail No. 6 also where women prisoners are also lodged; these teams interacted and made enquiries in respect of 278 prisoners/under trials; after verification, these teams prime facie found more than 100 of the aforesaid 278 prisoners to be juveniles i.e. who were less than 18 years of age at the time of commission of offence. Ages of some of such prisoners were as low as 15-16 years.
2. This startling revelation clearly demonstrates that neither proper inquiry is being conducted by the Police at the time of arresting or by the Magistrates when such prisoners are produced before these Magistrates. Once it is found that such prisoners were juveniles, sending them to jail even for a day amounts to denial of their fundamental right and right to liberty.
3. We have also been shown the order dated 16th March, 2012 titled State v. Rahu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.