Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

1. OA No.195/2009 was dismissed by the Armed Forces Tribunal as per decision dated August 12, 2011.

2. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Supreme Court challenging the said decision, which was registered as CA No.7485/2011. Vide order dated September 12, 2011, the appeal was dismissed. The order dismissing the appeal reads as under:

“On hearing Mr. Seeraj Bagga, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and on going through the materials on record, we see no reason to interfere in this matter. There is no infirmity in the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal. The appeal is dismissed.”

3. Thereafter, the petitioner sought a review of the order dated September 12, 2011 by filing RP(C)No.2292/2011. The same was dismissed by the Supreme Court vide order dated September 27, 2011, which reads as under:

“1. This petition is filed seeking review of the order dated September 12, 2011 passed in Civil Appeal No.7485 of 2011.

2. Prayer for oral hearing before the Court is rejected.

3. We have gone through the review petition and the record of the civil appeal. We find that the order of which review is sought does not suffer from any infirmity, much less any appa