SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 3054

M.L.MEHTA
Ravinder Vashisht – Appellant
Versus
Nanhi Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. O.N.Sharma, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advs.
For the Respondent: Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv. for R10.

JUDGMENT :

M.L. MEHTA, J.

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeks assailing the order dated 7.10.2010 of Addl. District Judge whereby the application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioner, who was the plaintiff in the suit bearing No. 721/08, was dismissed.

2. The petitioner has filed a suit for partition against the respondents. The instant application was filed seeking amendment in the plaint. The petitioner wanted to delete the properties bearing No. 147-B, Hari Nagar, Ashram and 88, Gali No. 37-A, Zakir Hussain Colony, Sakir Marg, Okhla, New Delhi from the properties to be partitioned. With regard to these properties, there was neither any objection by the respondents, nor by the court and consequently, the amendment with regard to deletion of these two properties from the ambit of the partition, was allowed.

3. The amendment was also sought for seeking relief of declaration and partition in respect of two shops bearing No. 111 and 113. The amendment in this regard was sought on the premise that during the pendency of the suit, defendant No. 5, in his statement under Order 10 Rule 2 CPC, had stated that shop No. 113 was sold by










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top