SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 2110

V.K.SHALI
Geeta – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. N.K. Guptaa, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Amit Dubey, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

V.K. Shali, J.

1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal against the judgment dated 9.4.2009 passed by the Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal dismissing the petition of the appellants bearing No.OA (IIU) 79/2008 for grant of compensation.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Gurdeep Singh is purported to have died as a result of injuries sustained by him in an untoward railway accident on 7.1.2008 at about 11 a.m. at platform No.3, Sadar Bazar Railway Station. It was alleged that he was involved in this accident on account of being a bona fide passenger in EMU Train No.SNP-2. The appellant No.1, Geeta, is the widow, appellant Nos.2 & 3 are the children and appellant No.4 is the mother of the deceased. The respondent/UOI filed its written statement and contested the claim of the appellants that the deceased was neither a bona fide passenger in the train nor did he died because of an untoward incident which would entitle the appellants to any claim.

3. On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed :-

“1. Whether the applicants prove that they are the dependants of the deceased Sh. Gurdeep Singh wi















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top