G.S.SISTANI, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Vinay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan – Respondent
G.S. Sistani, J (Oral):--
1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.
2. This case has a long history inasmuch as that the petitioner who was working as a TGT Maths with the respondent School since the year 1984 was issued a charge sheet on 29.06.2001. The charge sheet contained five articles of charge. After the inquiry was conducted, the petitioner was exonerated by the Disciplinary Authority, a fresh inquiry was conducted at the instance of the Assistant Commissioner of the respondent. The inquiry report was submitted on 17.12.2003. Three out of five charges against the petitioner stood proved. Based on the inquiry report, on 19.04.2004 a major penalty of removal from service was imposed upon the petitioner. OA.2461/2005 was filed by the petitioner in the year 2005. The OA was allowed on 04.12.2006. The Tribunal had issued a direction to the respondent to supply documents to the petitioner and thereafter commenced the enquiry proceedings.
3. The order of the Tribunal was assailed by the respondent herein by filing a writ petition bearing W.P.(C).No. 2296/2007. By an order dated 17.04.2007, the aforesaid writ petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.