DELHI HIGH COURT
Kailash Gambhir, P.S. Teji, JJ.
Bhawani Verma - Appellant
Versus
UOI & Anr. - Resopndent
W.P. (Crl.) 1214 of 2015
Decided On : 04-09-2015
COFEPOSA - Detention Order - Section 3(1)(i) and 3(1)(iii) - Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the detention order against the detenue, who was involved in illegal storage and export of prohibited 'Red Sanders woods'. The detention order was challenged on grounds of delay, subjective satisfaction, non-placement of documents, and incomplete documents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the delay in passing the detention order was justified due to extensive investigation and the need for sufficient and reliable evidence. The court upheld the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority based on the likelihood of the detenue's release on bail and the potential for continued prejudicial activities.
Issues: The issues revolved around the delay in passing the detention order, the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, and the withholding of documents by the sponsoring authority.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delay in passing the detention order was justified, the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority was based on valid grounds, and the withholding of documents did not affect the detention order.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the detention order.
P.S.Teji, J.:--
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the detention order bearing F.No. 673/13/2015-Cus. VIII dated 27.04.2015 passed under Section 3(1)(i) and 3(1)(iii) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter mentioned as ‘COFEPOSA’) against Sh. Deepak Verma (detenue) the petitioner’s husband and a direction to set at liberty the detenue from detention.
2. Vide impugned detention order dated 27.04.2015, detenue namely Deepak Verma was ordered by the respondent No. 2, the Joint Secretary to the Government of India, to be detained and kept in custody in Central Jail, Tihar, New Delhi with a view to prevent him from smuggling of goods, transportation and concealment of the smuggled goods in future.
3. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that an information was received by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) that one syndicate was involved in illegal storage and illegal export of ‘Red Sanders woods’ (Pterocarpus Santalinus) which is a prohibited item for export under the Foreign Trade Policy read with CITES. It was alleged that one Pawan Gupta and Deepak Verma were the kingpin of the syndicate who were procuring sanders from South India and illegally exporting the same in containers through ICD, Tughlakabad by concealing the same with other items declared in the shipping bill. The illicit export of red sanders to Sharjah, UAE was being attempted in container No. TTNU-3869887/20 under the guise of “Acrylic Bath Tubs and Bath Tub Accessories” under shipping bill No. 0018327 dated 16.10.2014 which was filed in the name of M/s Acqua Plus Global, Plot No. 3, NSEZ, Noida. Said container was examined vide panchnama dated 21.10.2014 and 24.10.2014. On its examination, 12820 kgs of red sanders wood valued at Rs. 6 crore was found apart from bath tubs. Residence of Anil Kumar Singh alleged accomplice of detenue was searched on 25.10.2014 and certain documents, a laptop and a pen drive were seized. He was taken to the godown at Bakhtawarpur, New Delhi where persons, namely, Thindu Sherpa, Manju Nath and Bobby were found. In the said godown, red sanders wood was also found. In their statements, Thindu Sherpa, Bobby and Manju Nath stated that they were working for the detenue, Pawan Gupta and his partner Bhimendra Kumar Goel and one Shankar who was allegedly engaged in the buying and selling of red sanders at Bengaluru in the alleged crime. Anil Kumar Singh, Thindu Sherpa, Babu @ Bobby and Manjunath were arrested on 28.10.2014 and the DRI filed a complaint under Section 132, 135(1)(a),(b) & (c) of the Customs Act, 1962 against all of them on 24.12.2014 before the Ld. CMM, New Delhi.
4. After issuance of summons to the detenue, he applied for anticipatory bail on 10.11.2014 in which he was granted the interim protection. Vide order dated 14.11.2014, the Ld. ASJ dismissed the anticipatory bail application and granted custodial interrogation of the detenue. His statement was recorded on 11.11.2014 and 12.11.2014. During investigation, further allegations were made against the detenue with regard to his past conduct and filing of past cases also. Further summons were issued to the detenue and Pawan Gupta in the months of November and December, 2014 but they did not turn up, due to which complaints under Section 172 and 174 Indian Penal Code were also filed against them. On 27.02.2015, the detenue was apprehended by DRI from Kolkata and he was arrested on 28.02.2015. Ld. CMM, Kolkata vide order dated 28.02.2015, rejected the oral bail prayer of the detenue and he was sent to Delhi on transit remand. Detenue was produced before the Ld. Duty MM, Delhi on 01.03.2015 and was granted four days” police remand. His statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 was recorded on 03.03.2015. Thereafter, the impugned detention order was pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.