SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 116

SWATANTER KUMAR, S. H. KAPADIA, K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN
RAHEJA UNIVERSAL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NRC LIMITED – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Swatanter Kumar, J.-An interesting question of law as to the ambit and scope of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (for short, the `Act of 1985') and its overriding application over the provisions of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (for short, the `Act of 1882'), with particular reference to Section 53A and Section 54 of the latter Act, arises for consideration in the present case. Reference to the basic facts which give rise to this proposition of law would be necessary and are as follows:

Facts:

2. NRC Limited is a company which was originally incorporated under the name and style of `National Rayon Corporation Limited' in the year 1946. However, subsequently, by an appropriate resolution of the Board of Directors, its name was changed to `NRC Limited' on 4th August, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the `Respondent- Company'). The Respondent-Company was engaged in the manufacture of viscos filament yarn, chemicals and allied products with its factory at Mohane, Kalyan, District Thane. As per the facts on record, the Respondent-Company was declared a `sick industrial company' in the year 1987, but as its net worth turned positive, v









































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top