NAJMI WAZIRI, ASHUTOSH KUMAR
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK KHOSLA – Respondent
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
1. After 26 judges of the Delhi High Court had recused themselves from hearing this and another criminal contempt petition (Cont Cas Crl. 12/2014), the Hon”ble Chief Justice has constituted this Special Division Bench to adjudicate upon the two pending petitions against the respondent, Deepak Khosla - an advocate, who has appeared before the Court.
Background/ Issue of Show Cause Notice
2. On 05.09.2014, in LPA No. 583/2014, the respondent, made certain unwarranted averments in his pleadings and in his oral submissions before a Division Bench of this Court comprising of Hon”ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon”ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha. Taking a prima facie view that the respondent”s submissions constituted criminal contempt and tended to scandalise and lower the authority/prestige of the court, the Court took suo moto cognizance of the same under Section 15(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and issued a show cause notice, vide order dated 8.9.2014, as to why the respondent should not be punished for contempt. The said order reads:
“1. By a common judgment and order made today, this Court has disposed of LPA Nos. 550/2104 (sic) and 583/2014 on t
Nirmala J. Jhala V. State of Gujarat
Lord Justice Donovan in Attorney General v. Butterworth 1963(1) QB 696
Andrew Paul Terence Ambrad v. The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago AIR 1936 PC 141
Lord Morris in Attorney General v. Times Newspapers 1974 AC 273
Haridas Das v. Smt. Usha Banik and Ors. and Apu Banik (AIR 2007 SC 2688)a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.