PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. Though arising out of two separate proceedings and two separate orders being challenged in the above captioned appeals, the factual backdrop though different but giving birth to the same legal issue, is the reason why the two appeals are being decided by a singular decision. Whereas Videocon Industries challenges the order dated July 21, 2015 passed in CS (OS) No.2074/2015, wherein the learned Single Judge has, in an anti-suit injunction matter, directed the Arbitral Tribunal comprising Hon’ble Justice (Retd.) G.T.Nanawati, Hon’ble Justice (Retd.) J.K.Mehra and Sh.Soli J.Sorabjee, Senior Advocate to hold arbitral proceedings only at Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) and has restrained the Tribunal from holding a hearing at Colombo (Sri Lanka); Cairn India Ltd., Ravva Oil (Singapore) and Videocon Industries Ltd. challenge the order dated August 14, 2015 passed in CS (OS) No.2445/2015 in a suit filed by the Union of India restraining the defendants in the suit from participating in the arbitration proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal comprising Andrew Berkeley, Sir Anthony Evans and Justice (Retd.) A.S.Anand.

2. The two arbitration proceedings emanate fro