SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 802

R.K.GAUBA
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KAMLESH KUMARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A. K. Soni, Adv.
Mr. Sameer Nandwani & Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advs. for R-1 with R-1 in person.

JUDGMENT :

R.K.GAUBA, J.

1. The insurance company is in appeal questioning the computation of compensation granted to the claimant (first respondent herein) by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the tribunal) on the claim petition under Sections 166 & 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the MV Act) registered as Suit no. 86/2011, on account of death of her son Mohit Kumar Gupta (the deceased), aged 24 years, in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 22.12.2009 at about 05:47 pm, involving a bus bearing registration no. DL-1PB-3927 (the offending vehicle) which admittedly was insured with the appellant/insurance company against third party risk for the period in question.

2. The tribunal assessed the compensation at Rs.20,04,000/- and awarded interest @ 7.5% p.a. in favour of the claimants, calculating the loss of dependency to the tune of Rs.19,44,000/-. It is this computation of loss of dependency which is the bone of contention in the appeal at hand.

3. The tribunal accepted the evidence of Deepak Gandhi (PW4), the Territory Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd. to the effect that the deceased was engaged with their Bank on contractual basis for a period of one year receiving basic salary of Rs

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top