G.ROHINI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
AMIT GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
CM No.3100/2016 (of petitioner for modification/clarification of the judgment dated 23rd December, 2015).
1. We heard the senior counsel for the petitioner/applicant, counsel for the respondents Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) and counsel for the respondent Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and reserved order on 19th February, 2016 with liberty to the counsels to file written submissions within one week. No written submission has been filed.
2. The senior counsel for the petitioner/applicant:
(i) contended that the direction contained in para 22 (A) & (B) of the final judgment dated 23rd December, 2015 to the Registrar / Sub-Registrar entrusted with the responsibility of registration of the document to “notify the parties presenting the instrument/document for registration that the consideration set forth in the instrument and the stamp duty computed on the basis thereof is less than the valuation as per the circle rates” and to “give them an opportunity to amend the document/instrument, to bring the valuation thereof for the purpose of payment of stamp duty, in consonance with the circle rates and make up deficiency in stamp duty” is not sanctioned by Section 47-A of the Indi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.