S.MURALIDHAR, VIBHU BAKHRU
Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
S. Muralidhar, J.
1. The common question that arises for consideration in these writ petitions concerns the validity of the action initiated by the Respondent Income Tax Department ('Department') against the Petitioners under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for non-deduction of tax at source (‘TDS’) for periods earlier than four years prior to 31st March, 2011. These petitions in turn involve the interpretation of the proviso to sub-section (3) of Section 201 of the Act, which was inserted with effect from 1st April, 2010.
2. Although the facts of these cases are more or less similar, the facts pertaining to Tata Teleservices Limited (‘TTSL’), the Petitioner in WP(C) No. 8642/2011, are first discussed. TTSL is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of providing telecommunication services across the country. TTSL has a central office in New Delhi. It provides post-paid and pre-paid telecommunication services for which it entered into agreements with various channel partners (distributors). In the pre-paid segment, TTSL sells products such as Recharge Coupon Vouchers (RCVs) and Starter Kits to channel pa
Spentex Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise (2016) 1 SCC 780
Desh Bandhu Gupta & Co. And Ors. v. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. (1979) 4 SCC 565
Ellerman Lines Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal
Deshbandhu Gupta & Co. v. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.