DEEPA SHARMA, J.

1. Both the plaintiff (appellant) and defendant Nos.1 to 3 (objectors) challenge the judgment and decree of the learned Single Judge dated 13.08.2014 which held that the agreement to sell dated 20.05.2006 for the sale of Property No. 225, Gulmohar Enclave, New Delhi – 49 along with car garage No.46 and Scooter garage No. 104 (in short the “suit property”) and its addendum dated 08.05.2007 were valid documents. The plaintiff was directed to pay the balance consideration amount of Rs. 65,40,000/- along with interest @ 18% per annum till the date of order and the defendants were directed to execute the sale deed within two months. The plaintiff's appeal challenges the directions to pay the interest on consideration amount. The defendants' cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) and challenge the impugned decree in entirety.

2. The brief facts of the case are that late Dr. G.K.J Malvankar, husband of the first defendant (and father of the second and third defendants) was allotted the suit property by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). He along with the defendants shifted to U.K where he died intestate. The suit property