VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Gillette India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
I.A. No. 6421/2016 (under Section 149 CPC)
1. Let the plaintiff make up the deficiency in the court fee within one week from today.
I.A. stands disposed of.
CS(OS) No.251/2016 and I.A. No.6420/2016 (stay)
2. This application is filed by the plaintiff in this suit for injunction and damages against the stated disparaging video advertisement issued by the defendant. Plaintiff is Gillette India Ltd which manufactures razors for hair removal and plaintiff sells these razors under the trademark VENUS and SIMPLY VENUS. Plaintiff’s razors have a typical light blue colour. Defendant/Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd manufactures hair removal creams and sells the said hair removal creams under the trademark “VEET”. The issue to be decided by this Court is the grant of ad interim injunction, till the disposal of this injunction application, against the defendant airing the impugned advertisement which as per the plaintiff is disparaging and contains falsehood. The relief clauses of the present application read as under:-
“a. pass an ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, its directors, officers, employees, agents, advertisers, distributors,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.