BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ASHUTOSH KUMAR
RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GILLETE INDIA LTD. – Respondent
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
CM No. 24688/2016 in FAO (OS) No. 185/2016 & CM No. 25348/2016 in FAO (OS) No. 206/2016 (Exemption)
Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Caveat No. 580/2016 in FAO (OS) No. 206/2016
Since the counsel for the caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged.
CM No. 25347/2016 in FAO (OS) No. 206/2016 (condonation of delay)
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 10 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
This application stands disposed of.
FAO (OS) No. 185/2016 & CM No. 23298/2016 (Stay) & FAO (OS) No. 206/2016
1. Both the appeals which arise out of the order dated 01.06.2016 passed in IA No. 6420/2016, under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the CPC in CS (OS) No. 251/2016, preferred by the defendant and the plaintiff respectively have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. For easy reference, the description of the parties would be referred to, in this order, in terms of the array of parties in CS (OS) No. 251/2016 wherein Gillette India Ltd. is the plaintiff and Reckitt Benckiser India Pvt. Ltd. is the defendant.
3. Gillette India Ltd. filed the said suit bearing CS (OS) No. 251/20
Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. (1999) 7 SCC 1
Dabur India Ltd. vs. Colortek Meghalaya Pvt. Ltd. (2010) 167 DLT 278 (DB)
Hindustan Lever Ltd v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. and Anr. 1998 (1) SCC 720
Tata Press Ltd. vs. MTNL & Ors. (1995) 5 SCC 139
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. V. Hindustan Unilever Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.