SANJIV KHANNA, J.

Dinesh Sareen and Bharat Sareen (the Appellants, for short), both sons of late Shayam Lal Sareen, in this Regular First Appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act impugn the order dated 8th March, 2016, whereby a preliminary decree of partition has been passed in CS (OS) No.2051/2012. The appellants have also prayed for setting aside of the order of the same date, by which the application for impleadment- I.A. No. 10121/2014- under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed by Navneet Singh Anand has been allowed.

2. During the course of hearing, it was brought to the notice of the appellants that they are the plaintiffs in CS (OS) No.2051/2012 in which they sought a decree of partition and the preliminary decree of partition granted is in terms of their prayer. Learned counsel for the appellants, in view of the said position, did not press and challenge the preliminary decree of partition. For the sake of convenience and lest there be any confusion, we would like to reproduce a portion of the impugned order dated 8th March, 2016 passed in CS (OS) No.2051/2012 relating to the preliminary decree of partition:-

“1. This is a suit for