PRATIBHA RANI
JAKIR MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant impugning the judgment dated 15.10.2013 and order of sentence dated 23.10.2013 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 363/366/419/376 IPC and sentenced as under:
(i)
U/S 363 IPC
to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs. 4000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one year.
(ii)
U/S 366 IPC
to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs. 4000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one year.
(iii)
U/S 419 IPC
to undergo RI for three years with fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for six months.
(iv)
U/S 376 IPC
to undergo RI for ten years with fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for two years.
2. This appeal has come up for hearing pursuant to the directions issued for expediting hearing in appeals filed by persons in custody (with sentence more than seven years and upto ten years).
3. The case FIR
Jai Krishna Mandal & Anr. v. State of Jharkhand
Narender Kumar Versus State (NCT of Delhi)
Pratap Misra & Ors. Vs. State of Orissa
Rajesh Patel Versus State of Jharkhand
Rajoo & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Rajasthan Versus Babu Meena
Suresh N. Bhusare & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Tameezuddin @ Tammu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.