SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 4209

PRATIBHA RANI
JAKIR MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal with Mr. Anwar A. Khan.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Diwaka.

JUDGMENT :

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant impugning the judgment dated 15.10.2013 and order of sentence dated 23.10.2013 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 363/366/419/376 IPC and sentenced as under:

(i)

U/S 363 IPC

to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs. 4000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one year.

(ii)

U/S 366 IPC

to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs. 4000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for one year.

(iii)

U/S 419 IPC

to undergo RI for three years with fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for six months.

(iv)

U/S 376 IPC

to undergo RI for ten years with fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for two years.

2. This appeal has come up for hearing pursuant to the directions issued for expediting hearing in appeals filed by persons in custody (with sentence more than seven years and upto ten years).

3. The case FIR






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top