G.S.SISTANI, VINOD GOEL
SRIPAL – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent not to dispossess, disturb him in any manner from the vending site being Footpath, Khoka Market, Pushp Vihar, Sector-1, Saket, New Delhi.
2. The petitioner claims to be vending at the aforesaid site and in 2007, the petitioner applied for issuance of tehbazari licence. Thereafter, since his application was not considered, he approached Zonal Vending Committee by filing application no.9729. By an order dated 05.10.2010, the Zonal Vending Committee held that the petitioner was neither entitled to preferential allotment nor any direction of status quo was granted. The petitioner had relied upon receipts showing payment of fine dated 07.07.2002, 07.07.2003, 19.12.2003 and 21.05.2004. The petitioner also filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority seeking an order of status quo relying under the provisions of National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2011. The Appellate Court had then directed maintenance of status quo with regard to the aforesai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.