MUKTA GUPTA
Gaurav Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. By Bail Application No.306/2016, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 638 of 2015 registered at PS Greater Kailash under Section 307 IPC and in Crl. M.C. 2624 of 2016 the petitioner challenges the order dated 19th January, 2016 declaring him a proclaimed offender.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even on the allegations in the complaint it is apparent that the injured Nitin misbehaved with the fiancée of the petitioner due to which quarrel took place between the petitioner and Nitin. Both petitioner and Nitin received injuries, however FIR was immediately written on the complaint of Konark Verma for injuries to Nitin and the complaint of the petitioner was not even accepted. Even on the complaint of the fiancée of the petitioner, FIR was registered after registering the above-noted FIR. The petitioner had filed anticipatory bail application before the learned ASJ. Proceedings for declaring the petitioner as proclaimed offender were taken in a haste after anticipatory bail was granted to Nitin in FIR No. 388/2015 under Sections 354A, 509, 323, 354, 34 IPC of which no notice was given to the complainant therein. The connivance of the i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.