SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 638

SUNIL GAUR
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Parmila Teotia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Amit Gaur, Mr. Pradeep Gaur
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Bansal

JUDGMENT :

1. The above-captioned two appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 2nd January, 2008 which grants compensation of Rs.16,87,400/- with interest @ 7% per annum to Claimants on account of death of one Krishan Pal Singh in a road accident on 21st February, 2004. In the above-captioned first appeal, reduction of compensation is sought whereas in the above-captioned second appeal, enhancement of compensation is sought.

2. The facts are already noted in detail in impugned Award and so, need no reproduction. Suffice to note that apart from the evidence of Claimants, there is evidence of Sameet Gambhir (PW-4), a friend of deceased, who has deposed on the income aspect of deceased. The breakup of compensation as awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) is as under:-

Compensation of loss of dependency

Rs.16,70,400/-

Love & Affection & Loss of Estate

Rs.10,000/-

Loss of Consortium

Rs.5,000/-

Funeral Expenses

Rs.2,000/-

Total

Rs.16,87,400/-

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the pa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top