VALMIKI J.MEHTA
ST. THOMAS SCHOOL – Appellant
Versus
MANISH KAUSHIK – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
1. By this writ petition under Article 226 & Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) dated 10.12.2015 by which the DST has allowed the appeal filed under Section 8(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and has directed reinstatement of the respondent no. 1 in this writ petition to the services with the petitioner/school. Respondent no. 1 in this writ petition was the appellant before the DST.
2. The facts of the case are that admittedly the respondent no. 1 was appointed by the petitioner/school in terms of the letter dated 4.4.2011. This letter of appointment of the respondent no. 1 reads as under:-
“ST. THOMAS SCHOOL
GOYALA VIHAR, NEAR SECTOR-19, DWARKA
NEW DELHI-110071
Ref: No. STTHMS/18/2011
DATED 04 APRIL 2011
To,
Sh MANISH KAUSHIK
S/o Sh SUGREEV KAUSHIK
VDP, DHANSA NEW DELHI-110073
SUB:- APPOINTMENT LETTER
Madam/Sir,
This is with reference to your interview for the post of PET in this school, I am pleased to inform you that you have been selected for the post in the pay scale of Rs. 12540 + 4660. The appointment will be governed by DSER and rules 1973 framed there under. Further, yo
Dayaram Dayal vs. State of M.P. AIR 1997 SC 3269
Delhi Public School & Another vs. Shalu Mahendroo & Others
Hamdard Public School vs. Directorate of Education and Another
Head Master, Lawrence School, Lovedale vs. Jayanthi Raghu and Another
Madhya Pradesh Thru. Registrar and Others vs. Satya Narayan Jhavar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.