SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1140

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Dayaram Dayal – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-The appellant, after going through the process of selection by the Public Service Commission, was appointed as Civil Judge, Class 2 in the Madhya Pradesh Subordinate Judicial Service by an order dated 22.10.1985. The order stated that he would have to undergo training for six months and be on probation for 2 years. The appellant completed training on 29.5.1986 and was put on probation for 2 years. He completed probation by 22.5.1988. On 2.3.1990, he was placed under suspension pending same charges. The charges were served on 3.3.1990, an inquiry report was given by the District Judge on 12.4.1991 and the High Court, in its Full Court Meeting dated 27/28.4.1991 resolved to impose a punishment of stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect. On 7.8.1991, the suspension was revoked and he resumed duties as Civil Judge Class II w.e.f. 7.8.1991. There were certain adverse remarks in the ACRs during 1987-88, 88-89, 89-90, 91-92 and 92-93. The inspection Judge of the High Court who inspected appellant s court on 26.2.92 also referred to certain irregularities. In the Full Court Meeting dated 3.5.92, the appellant was not found fit for confirmatio


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top