RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Mahadev I Todale – Appellant
Versus
Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
CM Nos. 23671-23672/2017 (both for exemptions)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The applications are disposed of.
CM (M) No. 687/2017 & CM No. 23670/2017 (for stay)
3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 4th March, 2017 of the Additional District Judge (ADJ) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner/defendant for deletion of his name as defendant in a suit filed by the respondent no. 1/plaintiff for recovery of damages for defamation.
4. The counsel for the respondent no. 1/plaintiff appears on advance notice and considering the nature of the controversy, the counsels have been heard at length.
5. The respondent no. 1/plaintiff Frankffin Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. is carrying on business of imparting education in vocational training in the field of aviation industry.
6. The respondents no. 6 and 7 viz. Rahul Haresh Bhatia and Haresh Bhatia, residents of Pune, approached the Police with a complaint of the respondent no. 1/plaintiff having cheated the respondents no. 6 and 7 as well as other students by misrepresenting that the respondent no. 1/plaintiff was entitled to impart education
Gangadhar Padhy vs. Prem Singh
M/s. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India
Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar vs. State of Maharashtra
Pearlite Liners (P) Ltd. vs. Manorama Sirsi
Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. Proprietors of Indian Express Newspapers
Raja Ram Pal vs. Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha
Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Shri Ram Singh Batra vs. Smt. Sharan Premi
Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.