SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1967

I.S.MEHTA
SANJAY KUMAR BASOYA – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jatan Singh and Mr. Pawan Madhukar, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Ms. Seema Gupta, Advocates, Mr. Izhar Ahmad

JUDGMENT :

I.S. MEHTA, J.

1. Instant revision petitions are preferred by the petitioner, i.e. Sanjay Kumar Basoya, under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the separate impugned judgments dated 28.03.2017 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS-02(Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in criminal appeals Nos., i.e. 24/2017, 23/2017 and 25/2017, conviction judgment dated 26.11.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-03, NI Act, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CC. Nos., i.e. 535341/16, 535338/16 and 535342/16, and order on sentence dated 20.02.2017 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-03, NI Act, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CC. Nos., i.e. 535341/16, 535338/16 and 535342/16.

2. The brief facts as alleged in the complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the respondent/complainant-Bank are that the petitioner had availed the OCC/OD limit of Rs. 50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs Only) from the respondent/complainant-Bank since the year 2005. It is further alleged that the petitioner failed to adhere t

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top