INDERMEET KAUR
PARAMOUNT SURGIMED LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PARAMOUNT BED INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
I.A. No.3682/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code) & I.A. No.4425/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code) in CS(COMM) 222/2017
1. The plaintiff Paramount Surgimed Limited is a company duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. The products of the plaintiff are manufactured and sold under the mark and name “PARAMOUNT” which is also the prominent part of the corporate name of the plaintiff company. These includes surgical blades, disposable scalpels, stitch cutters, skin graft blades etc. In para 6 of the plaint, it has been stated that the plaintiff company is also manufacturing, exporting and supplying intensive care hospital beds in India through its sister concern M/s United Poly Engineering Pvt. Ltd. which was established in the year 1980. The products of the plaintiff are being exported to over 50 countries. The word “PARAMOUNT” was first adopted by the plaintiff in the year 1993 as part of its corporate name. It is the registered proprietor of mark label “PARAMOUNT” under clause 10 (surgical, medical, dental etc.) as also in class 20 (furniture, mirrors, picture frames etc.) and its first registration dates back to 14.01.2000.
Anand Swarup v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 36 (1998) DLT 304
Marico Limited Vs. Agro Tech Foods Limited
Micolube India Ltd. v. Maggon Auto Centre and Anr. MANU/DE/0180/2008 : 150 (2008) DLT 458
Milment Oftho Industries and Others Vs. Allergen Inc.
Satish Khosla v. Eli Lilly Ranbaxy Limited MANU/DE/0763/1998 : 71 (1998) DLT 1
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. & Anr. Vs. Harinder Kohli & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.