SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2830

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
SIKANDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. Anita Abraham

JUDGMENT:

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.

1. The present appeal has been instituted under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned judgment dated 03.09.2011 and order on sentence dated 20.09.2011 by which the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 20(b) (ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 (here in after referred to as ‘NDPS’). The present appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years with fine of Rs. One lakh, in default thereof further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.

2. The case of the prosecution, as observed by the Special Judge, NDPS is as under:

“2. The case of the prosecution is that secret information was received by ASI Paramjeet Singh to the effect that one person namely Sikander would come under foot over bridge, ISBT to sell charas and on this basis the raiding party was constituted consisting of, ASI Paramjeet Singh, HC Sanjeev and HC Mahesh. Prior to this, secret informer was produced before Inspector M.L. Sharma who in turn inform














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top