SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2713

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Krishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Nos. 28321/2017 (for filing documents), 28322/2017 (for early hearing) & 28323/2017 (for exemption)

1. The applications for exemption, early hearing and taking on record the documents which form part of the trial court record are allowed.

C.M.s stand disposed of.

RFA No.661/2017

2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 17.7.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff whereby the appellant/plaintiff had sought an injunction against dispossession from 5 bighas and 2 biswas of land (5100 sq. yds.) forming part of Khasra no.1531, Village Aliganj, New Delhi and which adjoins Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi. The only basis of claim for injunction is the claim of the appellant/plaintiff to be in adverse possession of the suit land as against the respondents/defendants/Union of India/DDA. Admittedly the present owner of the property is said to be respondent no.2/DDA and which is the successor of the original owner being the respondent no.1/Union of India.

3. The facts and averments wi






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top