VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Krishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
C.M. Nos. 28321/2017 (for filing documents), 28322/2017 (for early hearing) & 28323/2017 (for exemption)
1. The applications for exemption, early hearing and taking on record the documents which form part of the trial court record are allowed.
C.M.s stand disposed of.
RFA No.661/2017
2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 17.7.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff whereby the appellant/plaintiff had sought an injunction against dispossession from 5 bighas and 2 biswas of land (5100 sq. yds.) forming part of Khasra no.1531, Village Aliganj, New Delhi and which adjoins Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi. The only basis of claim for injunction is the claim of the appellant/plaintiff to be in adverse possession of the suit land as against the respondents/defendants/Union of India/DDA. Admittedly the present owner of the property is said to be respondent no.2/DDA and which is the successor of the original owner being the respondent no.1/Union of India.
3. The facts and averments wi
Ananthula Sudhakar Vs. P. Buchi Reddy
Behram Tejani and Others Vs. Azeem Jagani
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke and Others Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation and Another
Premji Ratansey Shah and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Rame Gowda (Dead) By LRS. Vs. M. Varadappa Naidu (Dead) By LRs. and Another
Ramniklal Bhutta vs. State of Maharashtra
Ramniklal N. Bhutta and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Subramanya Swamy Temple, Ratnagiri Vs. V. Kanna Gounder (Dead) by LRs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.