RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Sambhav Kapur – Appellant
Versus
British Indo German Industrial Organics Private Ltd. – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit against the defendants no. 1 to 9 namely (i) British Indo German Industrial Organics Private Ltd. (ii) BIG Industrial Organics Private Limited (iii) Mr. Nitin Khullar (iv) Mr. Rakesh Rathour (v) Mr. Mangat Rai (vi) Mr. Raj Kumar Rathour (vii) Mr. Raman Kumar (viii) Mr. Vikram Rathour and (ix) Akash Rathour for (i) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling the goods under the mark PUREPASTE SAFETY SKIN PASTE or any other mark as may be identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's mark REINOL SAFETY SKIN PASTE amounting to passing off by the defendants of their goods as the goods and business of the plaintiff and diluting the plaintiff's mark REINOL SAFETY SKIN PASTE (ii) for delivery of all the impugned goods and (iii) for accounts.
2. The suit had come up first before this Court on 22nd November, 2016 when on the statement of the counsel for the plaintiff that there were some mistakes in pagination and amended plaint needs to be filed, the suit was adjourned for toda
Abhay Sapru vs. Chitralekha Bukshi
Guruswami Achari vs. Vengiduswami Achari
Lakshmi Narain vs. Union of India
Larsen & Toubro Ltd vs. Lachmi Narain Trades
Mahendra & Mahendra Paper Mills Ltd. vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (2002) 2 SCC 147
Ram Sarup Gupta vs. Bishun Narain Inter College
Sampuran Singh vs. Aryan Singh
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board vs. Madhusudan Dass
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs. Natco Pharma Ltd. (2014) 210 DLT 591
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.