S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

1. The appellant challenges the order dated 07.11.2016 passed by learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition. In the writ petition, the appellant had in a sense challenged the mutation of suit land and contended that they were entered illegally in the Revenue records.

2. The petitioner/appellant’s claims cultivator possession of the suit land, located in village Said-Ul-Ajaib which are part of Revenue estates of village Said-Ul-Ajaib.

3. Learned Single Judge has noticed that the petitioner had challenged the title of the respondents/purchasers. The suit abated and the matter was not pursued thereafter.

4. An earlier decision of the Revenue authorities was questioned before the Financial Commissioner, who too dismissed the petitioner’s contentions on 17.12.1991. That order attained finality upon rejection of the writ petition (C) 1874/1992, which was again unsuccessfully challenged before the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition.

5. In yet another round, (in W.P. 6824/2008), the Court had required an examination of the matter by the SDM. This time round, the Tehsildar decided the issue again adverse to the petitioner. The a