I.S.MEHTA
SHALINI DHINGRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
I.S. MEHTA, J.
1. By virtue of the above three captioned petitions, the petitioners invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950 to quash the summoning order dated 1st April, 2013 passed against the petitioners by Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket District Courts in Criminal Complaint No. 547/2/12.
2. The factual matrix of the case is that, the respondent no.2 –R. Vijaynandan Reddy filed a criminal complaint against the four petitioners herein namely
a. Rama Devi (accused no.1),
b. Krishna Priya (accused no.2),
c. Pradeep Dhingra (accused no.3) and
d. Shalini Dhingra (accused no.4)
under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket on 15.02.2012 alleging that Rama Devi in connivance with Smt. Shalini Dhingra forged a Will dated 14.02.1998 and sold the property bearing no.C-72, Freedom Fighters Cultural Centre, at Neb Sarai, Saket, New Delhi measuring 400 square yards (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said property’) .
3. As per the complaint, the said property was jointly owned by the respondent no.2- R. Vijaynandan Reddy, an advocate and his late grandf
Dhannulal & Ors. v. Ganeshram & Anr.
Hiralal & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd. & Ors.
Kishan Singh (D) through L.Rs. v. Gurpal Singh & Ors.
Mohd. Ibrahim & Ors. v. State of Bihar
Priya Varat Singh v. Shayam Sahay
Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor
State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal & Ors.
Suresh v. Mahadevappa Shivappa Danananna
Zandhu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd. & Others v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.