S.RAVINDRA BHAT, SUNIL GAUR
DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA COLLEGE – Appellant
Versus
AYUSHI SETHI – Respondent
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. The appellant is a constituent college of the Delhi University (hereafter, also, “the college”) and is funded and maintained by the grants received from the Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD). The college follows University statutes & Ordinances and is required to follow all the rules and regulations and notifications issued by the Delhi University, as the case may be, from time to time.
2. The Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are students (hereafter “the students”) of the college enrolled in the B. Com (Hons) course, and are in their second year, IVth semester. The students are aggrieved by the fact that admit-cards were not issued to them due to shortage of attendance.
3. The college, in accordance with its practice displays the attendance of all students for all the papers/subjects at the end of each month on the college website. In terms of Ordinance VII of the Ordinances of the University of Delhi (also hereafter referred to as “the Ordinance”), each student should necessarily have 66.7 % (2/3rd) attendance in aggregate as a condition of eligibility to
Ashok Kumar Thakur v. University of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Bar Council of India and Anr. v. Aparna Basu Mallick and Ors
Basawaraj and Ors. v. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
Regional Engineering College, Hamirpur and Anr. v. Ashutosh Pandey
Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology & Anr v. Gagandeep Sharma & Anr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.