RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Abdul Rashid Rather – Appellant
Versus
Raju @ Raju Kumar – Respondent
CM No.32359/2017 (for condonation of 18 days delay in filing).
1. For the reasons stated, allowed.
2. The application stands disposed of.
CM No.32358/2017 (for exemption).
3. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
4. The application stands disposed of.
C.R.P. No.197/2017.
5. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order (dated 24th April, 2017 in CS No.111/2017 of the Court of Additional District Judge-02, Central, Delhi) of dismissal of the application of the petitioner/plaintiff under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the counter claim filed by the respondent/defendant no.4 Ashok Puri to the suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff.
6. The counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff has been heard.
7. The petitioner/plaintiff instituted the suit, from which this petition arises, for recovery of possession of immovable property from respondents/defendants no.1 to 4 claiming title to the property on the basis of the Sale Deed executed in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff by the respondent/defendant no.2 Savitri Devi and who had in turn purchased the property from respondent/defendant no.4/counterclaimant Ashok Puri.
8. The resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.