SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4401

HIMA KOHLI, DEEPA SHARMA
D – Appellant
Versus
P @ R – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vijay Malik, Mr. Jogminder Rana

JUDGMENT :

Deepa Sharma, J.

1. The appellant/husband has assailed the order dated 04.08.2017 of the Family Court, dismissing his petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the HM Act”).

2. The admitted facts of the case are that the marriage between the appellant/husband and the respondent/wife was solemnized on 07.11.2011, according to the Hindu rites, customs and ceremonies. Out of this wedlock, a male child namely, Kartik was born on 15.08.2012.

3. The appellant has alleged in his divorce petition that the marriage was solemnized without taking any dowry; that on the very first day of their marriage, the respondent/wife had shifted all her belongings to the first floor of the house; that she had refused to serve the parents of the appellant; that a fraud was played upon him by her parents as well as the mediator who had concealed the correct age of the respondent who was 35 years of age at the time of the marriage, while he was just 25 years old, i.e. ten years younger to her.

4. It was further contended that the respondent/wife never had any respect for the family members of the appellant/husband and ha



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top