SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, DEEPA SHARMA
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Mittal – Respondent
DEEPA SHARMA, J.
1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioner/Bank has challenged the common order dated 11.02.2015 of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “DRAT”) in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 492/2013 in TA No. 02/2003, Appeal No. 493/2013 in T.A. No. 12/2002, Appeal No. 494/2013 in T.A. No. 7/2002 and Appeal No. 495/2013 in T.A. No. 8/2002.
2. The brief facts essential for disposal of these writ petitions are as under:-
The petitioner/Bank (hereinafter referred as Bank) filed a suit for recovery of sum of Rs. 15,49,791.81/- against Mr. S.K. Mittal and others namely, M/s Indo Travel Services Pvt. Ltd., Lamba Foreign Travels Pvt. Ltd., Sh. B.M. Lamba, Sh. M.M. Lamba, Smt. Savitri Lamba before this Court in the year 1985. The respondent No. 1 Sh. S.K. Mittal (hereinafter referred as Sh. S.K. Mittal) who had three fixed deposits with the Bank and the amount due in those fixed deposits was adjusted by the bank towards the dues of borrower, also filed three suits against the Bank, claiming payment of the amounts due on his Fixed Deposit receipts. All these four suits were transferred to DRT by this Court in earlier proceedings, with directions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.