SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 284

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
REKHA PALLI, J.
ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL VENDORS & ORS - Petitioner
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS - Respondent
WP(C) No.7414, 10052 of 2017 & C.M.Nos.30616, 30617, 41018 of 2017
Decided On : 21-02-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta with Mr.S.Anand, Advs.
For the Respondent: Mr.Amit Bansal, Adv. with Ms.Manisha Singh, Ms.Isha Khanna, Adv. with Ms.Anam Ahmed, Adv.

The sale of books, both NCERT and non NCERT, stationery items and uniform in the School premises without coercing the students/parents to buy them only from those shops, cannot be termed as “commercialization”.

Headnote:

CBSE - Affiliation Bye-laws - Commercialization - Sale of books, stationery, uniforms, and school bags within the School premises - Circulars issued by CBSE prohibiting the same - Challenge - Whether the sale of the aforementioned items in the school shops would amount to “commercialization” or not - Whether the CBSE, upon receipt of complaints that the students/parents were being coerced by the school to buy the said items from these shops, could have outrightly prohibited their sale in these school shops or whether it ought to have only regulated the same by ensuring that stringent action is taken against those erring schools, which coerce the student/parents to buy these items from the school shops only - Whether the prohibition of the sale of the non NCERT books and uniform etc. within the School premises by the CBSE is considered in the light of the observations of the Supreme Court in the case Ramlila Maidan Incident, IN RE reported as (2012) 5 SCC 1 - Whether the impugned circulars actually violates any statutory provision as is sought to be contended by learned counsel for the Parents-Students Welfare Association.

Fact of the Case:

The present writ petitions involve inter-related issues, though the prayers made therein are diametrically opposite and are accordingly being decided vide this common judgment. The first petition which has been filed by an Association of persons engaged in the business of trading and sale of uniforms, books, stationery etc. in different Schools of Delhi and two parents of School going children, challenges the Circular dated 19th April, 2017 as also the order dated 4th July, 2017 rejecting the Petitioner’s representation dated 26.5.2017, both passed by Respondent no.1/CBSE, whereby the affiliated Schools have been prohibited from selling books, both NCERT and non-NCERT, stationery items, as also uniform from shops within the School premises. The second writ petition has been filed by Parent-Students Welfare Association, claiming to be an association of parents of school-going children, challenging Circular dated 24th/25th August, 2017, issued by CBSE, primarily on the ground that the said circular permits commercial activities of selling books and stationery through vendors within the School premises and is therefore not only in contravention of its earlier Circular dated 19th April, 2017, but is also violative of various CBSE Affiliation Bye-Laws and more particularly of Affiliation Bye-laws No.14(B) & 19.1 (ii) & (iii), which prohibits commercialization or carrying out business activities in the School.

Finding of the Court:

1. The sale of books, both NCERT and non NCERT, stationery items and uniform in the School premises without coercing the students/parents to buy them only from those shops, cannot be termed as “commercialization”. 2. The CBSE, upon receipt of complaints that the students/parents were being coerced by the school to buy the said items from these shops, could not have outrightly prohibited their sale in these school shops but ought to have only regulated the same by ensuring that stringent action is taken against those erring schools, which coerce the student/parents to buy these items from the school shops only. 3. The prohibition of the sale of the non NCERT books and uniform etc. within the School premises by the CBSE is not considered in the light of the observations of the Supreme Court in the case Ramlila Maidan Incident, IN RE reported as (2012) 5 SCC 1, as the impugned decision does not relate to any academic matter or is in any way related to maintenance of standards of education to be imparted to the students of the affiliated schools. 4. The impugned circulars actually violates any statutory provision as is sought to be contended by learned counsel for the Parents-Students Welfare Association.

Issues: 1. Whether the sale of the aforementioned items in the school shops would amount to “commercialization” or not. 2. Whether the CBSE, upon receipt of complaints that the students/parents were being coerced by the school to buy the said items from these shops, could have outrightly prohibited their sale in these school shops or whether it ought to have only regulated the same by ensuring that stringent action is taken against those erring schools, which coerce the student/parents to buy these items from the school shops only. 3. Whether the prohibition of the sale of the non NCERT books and uniform etc. within the School premises by the CBSE is considered in the light of the observations of the Supreme Court in the case Ramlila Maidan Incident, IN RE reported as (2012) 5 SCC 1. 4. Whether the impugned circulars actually violates any statutory provision as is sought to be contended by learned counsel for the Parents-Students Welfare Association.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The term “commercialization” in schools, would thus mean only carrying out of activities wholly unconnected with education. The availability of uniform, non NCERT reference books or even food items for sale only to the students of the school, in my opinion, does not fall in the category of and cannot at all be considered as “commercialization”. 2. The CBSE could not have outrightly prohibited the sale of the said items in the School instead of regulating their sale by imposing reasonable restrictions. 3. The impugned decision does not relate to any academic matter or is in any way related to maintenance of standards of education to be imparted to the students of the affiliated schools and, therefore, the Court can examine whether the impugned circulars are unfair or unreasonable, irrational and arbitrary. 4. The impugned circulars actually violates any statutory provision as is sought to be contended by learned counsel for the Parents-Students Welfare Association.

Final Decision: 1. The Writ Petition No.7414/2017 filed by the Petitioners/Association of School Vendors is allowed and the circular dated 19th April, 2017 issued by CBSE is quashed and set aside. It is further directed that the Petitioners shall not be prohibited from selling of non NCERT books and uniforms also in the tuck shops which have been allowed to be set up in the CBSE affiliated schools for selling NCERT books and stationery items vide circular dated 24th/25th August, 2017. The conditions in circular dated 18.12.2017 prohibiting sale of Non-NCERT books in the school shops also stand quashed. The Respondents would however be free to take regulatory steps to ensure that the students and parents are not coerced in any manner, to buy any items from these shops. 2. The writ petition No.10052/2017 filed by the Parents-Students Welfare Association is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

REKHA PALLI, J.

1. The present writ petitions involve inter-related issues, though the prayers made therein are diametrically opposite and are accordingly being decided vide this common judgment. The first petition which has been filed by an Association of persons engaged in the business of trading and sale of uniforms, books, stationery etc. in different Schools of Delhi and two parents of School going children, challenges the Circular dated 19th April, 2017 as also the order dated 4th July, 2017 rejecting the Petitioner’s representation dated 26.5.2017, both passed by Respondent no.1/CBSE, whereby the affiliated Schools have been prohibited from selling books, both NCERT and non-NCERT, stationery items, as also uniform from shops within the School premises.

2. The second writ petition has been filed by Parent-Students Welfare Association, claiming to be an association of parents of school-going children, challenging Circular dated 24th/25th August, 2017, issued by CBSE, primarily on the ground that the said circular permits commercial activities of selling books and stationery through vendors within the School premises and is therefore not only in contravention of its earlier Circular dated 19th April, 2017, but is also violative of various CBSE Affiliation Bye-Laws and more particularly of Affiliation Bye-laws No.14(B) & 19.1 (ii) & (iii), which prohibits commercialization or carrying out business activities in the School.

3. For the sake of convenience, parties in the first petition are being referred to as the Petitioners/Respondents hereinafter and the Petitioner in the second petition is being referred to as the Parents-Students Welfare Association.

4. The facts which emerge from the two petitions are that the CBSE is one of the Boards as defined in Section 2(s) of Delhi School Education Act & Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as DSEAR, 1973) established for the purpose of conducting “public examination”.

5. The private unaided Schools are granted recognition upto Elementary, Secondary and Senior Secondary levels by the Directorate of Education (hereinafter referred to as DOE), Govt. of NCT of Delhi/Respondent no.2, under the provisions of DSEAR, 1973 and Right to Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “RTE Act, 2009”), and are governed by the provisions of these Acts. The Managing Committees of these Schools are bound to comply with the provisions of DSEAR, 1973 and the RTE Act, 2009, for managing the affairs of the School. The DOE is the regulatory authority over the said private unaided recognised Schools within the provisions of DSEAR, 1973 and the RTE Act, 2009, and the said Schools are bound to follow the guidelines, orders, notification etc. issued by the DOE from time to time.

6. The Respondent no.1 issued a Circular dated 19th April, 2017, which was in the nature of an advisory to the Schools not to indulge in any commercial activity by way of selling of books, stationery, uniforms and School bags etc. within the School premises and to adhere to the provisions of Affiliation Bye-laws of the Board. The Schools were further directed to desist from the unhealthy practice of coercing the parents to purchase books/uniform etc. from within the School premises or from selected vendors only.

7. Aggrieved by the issuance of circular dated 19.04.2017, the Petitioners challenged the same before this Court by way of writ petition being WP (C) No.4322/2017 titled as Association of School Vendors Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors., wherein this Court, after noticing the fact that even though the circular had been addressed to all the heads of CBSE affiliated schools, but the Petitioner being the association of school vendors, may have a grievance, disposed of the petition vide its order dated 19th May, 2017 by holding that it would be appropriate if the Petitioners were to make a representation to the CBSE within ten days and directed the CBSE to decide the same within a period of four weeks.

8. Pu







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top