S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA
SANTOSH MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) – Respondent
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.
1. The Appellant, who is the mother of the deceased, has filed the present appeal being aggrieved by the judgment dated 22nd March, 2016 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) 04 (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.30/15 arising out of FIR No.78/10 registered at Police Station (“PS”) Crime Branch (Bawana), acquitting Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 of the offences under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code (“IPC”).
2. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 were charged with committing the murder of the Appellant's daughter Rashmi (the deceased) by shooting her with firearms outside her factory at No. N-12, Sector-8, DSIDC, Bawana on 6th April 2010 at around 6.30 pm. In the trial that ensued, Amandeep, the husband of the deceased was arrayed as Accused No.2 (A-2) and his elder brother Navdeep was arrayed as A-1. Pradeep, the brother-in-law of A-1 was arrayed as A-3. Kulbir, an associate of A-2, was arrayed as A-4. In the present appeal the accused A1 to A4 are the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 respectively. The Appellant, who is the mother of the deceased appeared as Prosecution Witness (PW) No.2 in the trial.
3. While the State did not appeal against the acquittal of
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P. (2002) 4 SCC 85
Brajesh Mavi v. The State (2012) 7 SCC 45
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415
Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra (1997) 5 SCC 341
Nivrutti Pandurang Kokate v. The State of Maharashtra (2008) 12 SCC 565
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra 1984 (4) SCC 116
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.