Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. The Respondents/Plaintiffs - Smt. Badru Nisa and Sh. Parvez Ahmed wife and son, respectively of Late Sh. Faiz Ahmed (hereinafter ‘Plaintiffs’), filed a suit for possession and permanent injunction against the Appellants/Defendants - Sh. Shakeel Ahmed, Sh. Wakeel Ahmed and Smt. Asma Parveen (hereinafter ‘Defendants’). The said suit was decreed by the Trial Court in the following terms:

“RELIEF

From the above discussions and in view of my findings recorded on issues no.4, 5 & 6, I am of the opinion that suit of the plaintiffs deserves to be decreed and is hereby decreed. A decree for possession in respect of the suit property is passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. A decree of permanent injunction is also passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants restraining the defendants, their associates, workmen, family members etc. from transferring, assigning or part with the possession of the suit property. No order as to cost. Decree sheet be drawn accordingly.

File be consigned to Record Room.”

2. The case of the Plaintiffs is that Late Sh. Faiz Ahmed and Plaintiff No.1-Smt. Badru Nisa had purchased the suit property