RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Ravinder Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Kishan Kumar Pauchauri – Respondent
1. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 4th May, 2016 in CS No. 360/2014 of the Court of the Additional District Judge-02 (NE), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi] in favour of the respondent no.1/plaintiff and against the petitioner/defendant no.1 and respondents no.2 to 8/defendants with respect to property bearing No. K-5/39A, Street No.33, West Ghonda, Delhi – 110053, of (i) recovery of possession of the said property; (ii) of permanent injunction restraining creation of any third party interest or parting with possession of property except without due process of law; and, (iii) of declaration that the documents in possession of the petitioner/defendant no.1 and respondents no.2 to 8/defendants in respect of title to the aforesaid property are null and void and of cancellation of said documents.
2. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the CPC, instead of an appeal under Section 96 of the CPC, has been preferred against the impugned decree owing to the suit filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff, insofar as for recovery of possession, being titled as under Section 6 of the Specific Relie
Adapa Tatarao Vs. Chamantula Mahalakshmi
Anathula Sudhakar Vs. P. Buchi Reddy
ITC Limited Vs. Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society Limited
Krishna Ram Mahale Vs. Shobha Venkat Rao
Lallu Yeshwant Singh Vs. Rao Jagdish Singh
Muddanna Vs. Panthanagere Group Panchayat, Kengeri Hobli
Nair Service Society Ltd. Vs. Rev. Father K.C. Alexander
Sanjay Kumar Pandey Vs. Gulbahar Sheikh
State of U.P. Vs. Maharaja Dharmender Prasad Singh
S.R. Ejaz Vs. T.N. Handloom Weavers’ Cooperative Society Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.