R.K.GAUBA
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Rajora – Respondent
1. The petitioner was married to the first respondent on 31.10.2009. From out of their cohabitation, a child took birth on 30.11.2011. It is stated that the petitioner was constrained to leave the matrimonial home with her child on 13.02.2012. The first respondent (husband) sued for divorce sometime in 2013-2014. Subsequent to that event, the petitioner (wife) presented a complaint (CC no.178/6/14) in the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate invoking Section 12 read with Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, Domestic Violence Act) seeking various reliefs.
2. The respondent (husband), who had been called by the process issued on the said complaint moved an application seeking its dismissal primarily on the ground that it was barred by limitation. The Metropolitan Magistrate dismissed the said application by her order dated 12.08.2015 observing that the issue of limitation required inquiry and evidence to be called for.
3. The above-said order was challenged by the respondent by appeal (Crl. A. no.35/15 – new no.54855/16) in the court of the Sessions. The first appellate court, by its judgment dated 30.09.2016, upheld
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.