R.K.GAUBA
ECL Finance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sukhmani Bedi – Respondent
1. The petitioner had instituted a criminal complaint (CC No. 541/2013) in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate on 03.04.2013 involving offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The respondents herein were impleaded in the said criminal complaint as third and fifth prospective accused, this in addition to M/s Cedar Infonet Private Ltd. (accused no.1), Lt. Col. H.S. Bedi (accused no.2) and Ms. Maninder Bedi (accused no.4). The allegations in the case concerned a cheque bearing no. 933743 dated 28.02.2013 for Rs. 52,64,384/- which had been issued under the signatures of Lt. Col. H.S. Bedi (second accused) against the account of M/s Cedar Infonet Pvt. Ltd. (first accused) which, upon presentation by the petitioner, was dishonoured. It was alleged that a notice of demand was issued to all the five persons, arrayed as accused on 05.03.2013, to which there was no response, nor any payment received and consequently the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 had been committed.
2. The Metropolitan Magistrate, after preliminary inquiry, issued summons, by order dated 04.06.2013, against all the five persons shown in the array of a
Ashesh Devendrabhai Vyas v. The State of Delhi & Anr.
Central Bank of India vs. Asian Global Limited & Ors.
Gunmala Sales (P) Ltd. vs. Anu Mehta
N.K. Wahi vs. Shekhar Singh & Ors.
National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. vs. Harmeet Singh Paintal & Anr.
Paresh P. Rajda vs. State of Maharashtra
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Neeta Bhalla & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.