SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2306

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Ranbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sajanti Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.K. Jain, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. C.M. Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

1. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment [dated 18th February, 2017 in RCA No.196/2016 (Unique ID No.02402C0034422016) of the Court of Additional District Judge, Shahdara] allowing the First Appeal filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the judgment and decree [dated 25th April, 2016 in Civil Suit No.275/2010 (Unique ID No.02403C0221442010) of the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Shahdara] of dismissal of suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellant/defendant for recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- along with interest and costs. Resultantly, vide the impugned judgment, a decree has been passed in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and against the appellant/defendant for recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest.

2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 12th July, 2017, when, without expressing satisfaction that the appeal entails a substantial question of law and without framing a substantial question of law, notice of the appeal was issued and subject to the appellant depositing 50% of the decretal amount in this Court, execution stayed. Vide subsequent order dated 3rd November, 2017, the trial















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top